Father of free energy?: Nikola Tesla
Maybe it's time to come clean on the Archons. Unlike the Gnostic mystics who, it seems, as a result of their direct experience, took the Archons to be literally and inorganically real, I have to date no such personal experience (I should consider myself fortunate in that respect, I suppose). I can therefore claim no definite take on their status. In the manner described in my most recent post, 'Conspiracy? Wot Conspiracy?', I 'hold' them in my mind, an item in the portfolio of possibilities. Whatever the literal truth of the Archons may be, the adjective 'Archontic' to denote a mindset, a way of thinking and the creation of that way of thinking, is illuminating like no other. It has helped me to understand various phenomena in a clear, precise manner that previously seemed impossible.
Large segments of the modern environmental movement (so-called) is obviously a product of Archontic thinking and action. As John Lash describes in Chapter Seven of 'Not in His Image', the main method of Archontic deception is, in Greek, antimimon, literally 'countermimicry'. 'This means to copy something but make the copy, the fake version, serve a purpose counter to the original thing or idea.' Much modern environmentalism fits the bill to perfection, so much so that it takes the breath away. The sense of sacred connectedness felt by indigenous peoples from time immemorial, fed into the modern west by pioneers such as John Muir a century ago, and more recently by others like Arne Naess and the notion of 'deep ecology', has been turned on its head by self-serving ideologists and delusional groupings who have already taken up more space on Pale Green Vortex than they deserve.
One such grouping in particular, the multinational windfarm conquistadors, are probably pooing themselves at the moment. If not, they should be. This is as a result of the discovery of huge deposits of shale gas in Lancashire, northern England, which opens up the possibility of reasonably-priced, reliable energy supply for decades to come; in brief, everything that wind turbines fail to deliver. There are pollution questions surrounding shale gas and its means of extraction, 'fracking'. How serious these are, I don't know, and probably neither does anyone else. Predictably, the CO2 fanatics are up in arms as well. But these concerns can hardly outweigh those of the wholesale destruction of wild landscapes by wind abominations, not to mention the devastation of large tracts of peat bog, the Scottish CO2-trapping equivalents of the Amazon rainforest.
Energy is the key to many things. It is a topic through which people can be easily manipulated by the generation of fear, be it of nuclear leakage, the Earth frying due to Anthropogenic Global Warming, or whatever. Free energy is anathema to the current Power Complex, since it would liberate people from one of the main means by which the Dominators can control them - their need for energy. In the past, it would seem, anyone getting too close to the secrets of free energy would be dealt with appropriately: ridiculed as mentally unstable, bought out and the plans thrown away, or with poison or a gun. Interestingly, 'open source methodology' has been introduced into the field to avoid such problems in the future. This consists of making ideas widely available immediately; getting them 'out there', into the public domain, so taking out the inventor will be pointless.
Of course, some of the chief local Archons, notably Chris Huhne and Caroline Lucas (a self-confessed Watermelon, by the way, and proud of it!), are already up in arms about shale gas. Presumably, they prefer to see people die of cold - it's mainly old people, after all, not very productive members of society, but at least dying in a good cause. In the meantime, the shale gas story will, I suspect, unravel most interestingly. I predict a concerted dirty tricks campaign, spearheaded by the BBC and one or two choice national newspapers. It will focus on pollution hazards (real, imagined, and exaggerated), CO2 fears (largely Archontic imagination), and give great prominence to deluded, new-school environmentalists protesting. This is actually already happening on the BBC, by the way. It's funny how these same media outlets don't give ANY coverage to all the other protests and campaigns that spring up locally in response to nearly every new windfarm proposal. Still these are real people, whose real quality of life is being threatened, not self-righteous ideologues out on an Archontic picnic. This is media eco-fascism for you.
