It was, I suppose, decided a long time ago: 'give them windfarms.' The juggernaut that has bulldozed them through regardless of matters of sane economics, local democratic concerns, unreliability, damage to the environment and community quality of life, and loss of landscape, suggests something of a predetermined programme. A quick piece of personal research into the realities of the situation will confirm that any claims of 'democracy and consultation' are a fake that has become increasingly transparent. The web of lies, deceit, and dishonesty surrounding the windfarm scam becomes increasingly brazen and blatant by the day. The perpetrators no longer even bother to hide their criminality, with politicians transparently engaged in conflict-of-interest scenarios. I know that James Delingpole's blog appears courtesy of the 'Daily Telegraph', a fact which ruffles some readers' political sensibilities (sensibilities, I may add, that are outmoded and no longer relevant). But his tireless work on this theme is more than admirable. To see something of the entire thing unravel shamelessly right before your eyes, read some of his articles: the one dated August 22nd 2012, on Tim Yeo and Lord Deben, is an eye-opening place to begin.
In one sense, giant windfarms are entirely appropriate for the world we live in - at least the sliver of reality that likes to present itself as the whole thing. They are metal-and-plastic totems to the essential ugliness, inefficiency, materialism, and power hierarchy that control system operators would have us believe is the one-and-only truth. Even the Victorians would not have accepted windfarms: how can you build an industrial revolution on a power source that doesn't work half the time? The goodly Queen of Empires would not have been amused. Indeed, we can begin to speculate that the expense and inefficiency of wind is actually a deliberate part of a creeping agenda.......
Act Two: We don't need no edyookayshun
In an interview given last year (18/11/11, Grok-the-Talk), John Lash declares that, in his view, 're-education' is more essential than 'raising consciousness' at this point in time. Re-education, in this case, referring to educating ourselves as to what is really going on, rather than simply what we have been told to believe is true. He uses the popularisation of Social Darwinism as an example of an area where this process of re-education is needed: how, requiring an ideology to back up and render respectable their predatory activities, bankers, lawyers, and other authorised criminals of the late 19th century leapt at Darwin's theories, embracing the notion of 'survival of the fittest'. Darwin's ideas were quickly reified into hard fact, and distorted to justify elitism and the entire edifice of dominator culture. A bastardised form of Darwin is now accepted by the majority of people (in Europe, at least) as indisputable fact, while its premise, that predation within a single species is the general modus operandi, turns out to be a lie.
As I listened to John Lash, I couldn't help but draw parallels with the so-called environmental movement of today, and the global warming con. In fact, the strategy remains exactly the same! Globalist predators, those control freaks on a big scale, similarly require an ideology to use as a front for their nefarious deeds. Global warming turned out to be an ideal cause. Firstly, it is indeed fit for a global agenda - it affects every single being on the planet, so is an ideal carrier for a planetary clarion call. Visions of cities drowning as seas rise, glaciers and ice sheets crashing dramatically, crops burnt to a cinder, readily invoke fear and insecurity, creating an atmosphere in which people can easily be manipulated and will readily cede to new controls, regulations, taxes, etc. All in the name of 'saving the planet'. Finally, through the global warming con, an appeal is made to people with genuinely good hearts but who have failed to do their homework. This, in a sense, is the most evil aspect of all: how good, well-wishing, caring people have been hoodwinked into supporting measures that, beneath the mask, are intended to play into the hands of a small number of people whose aims are control and domination. The plan is gloriously simple - yet superbly effective.
Act Three: Planet Slave, 1969-style
March 1st 1969 is one of the more notorious dates in the calendar of rock music history. Late on this day, the Doors gave a concert (of sorts) in Miami that led to Jim Morrison being charged (wrongly) with lewd and lascivious behaviour, a move by the authorities that had profound effects on the remainder of Morrison's brief life. Film clips and photos from the night famously fail to illustrate Jim actually engaging in this 'lewd and lascivious behaviour', but they do reveal other fascinating material. At one point in the fiasco that barely deserves the title 'concert', the alcohol-riddled Morrison berates the already uncontrollable audience: 'You're all a bunch of slaves.' This ranting could easily be dismissed simply as the drunken Morrison behaving obnoxiously, as the drunken Morrison was inclined to do. There may, however, be more to this outburst than random babble.
In his short yet meteoric career, Jim Morrison had learnt, among other things, how to precisely and utterly manipulate an audience (plus the cops often out in force). On form, he was a master of the art. Ray Manzarek, Doors keyboard player, considered Morrison at his best to fulfil a function similar to that of the ancient shaman, leading others into states of consciousness that would otherwise remain inaccessible to them. But there is another, darker, side to this power over the audience. In Morrison, the ease by which a crowd could be manipulated, provoked contempt for its members. 'You're all a bunch of slaves' is not exactly the way to ingratiate yourself with an audience. No other figure from the pantheon of '60s rock could be imagined as insulting his/her fans in this way. Fascinated by how the mass of people could be controlled, and in fact were controlled, Morrison saw more than he could reliably handle. He saw how even the youth of America, supposedly the vanguard of change, ushering in a new, more aware and liberated era, were on the whole no different from the generations that had gone beforehand.
During the summer before the Miami incident, Jim had told Ray Manzarek that he wanted to leave the band. He wasn't feeling too good; in fact, he was having a mental breakdown. 'I just can't take it any more.' The prospect of the Doors without Morrison was unthinkable: Ray persuaded Jim to stay on, to review things after six months. Commentators glibly parrot the notion that fame was proving too hot to handle. In Jim's case, however, I suspect things were more complex. His own experiments in pushing the boundaries and in wilful manipulation led to his seeing an awful lot about the human condition. Not all of this was very pretty - specifically, the essential slave nature of the mass of humanity. Complicated further by mass adulation, a poetic soul, and being the sexiest rock god on the planet, Morrison proceede to devote himself to the consumption of vast quantities of alcohol, eschewing more sober and psychedelic approaches to the human condition. The rest, as they say, is history. To perceive a shocking truth is no joke. When Jim died two years later, the Lords of Darkness will have shed few tears.
Act Four: Developing the Slave System
I began investigating the truth about windfarms over six years ago. Uncovering the windfarm fraud led me seamlessly into the hornet's nest of global warming lies and deception. From here it was a small step to the Pandora's box of control system machinations in general. The crucial skill to develop along the way has been the ability to identify when what we are told is happening is dramatically different to what is really going on. A detective's approach, involving a mix of critical discernment and keeping those antennae of intuition in good shape, is what's needed.
Now, for me, things are really beginning to come together. Political, social, economic, and cultural events which once would have appeared weird, inexplicable, or merely random, all make sense within a perspective of overall global agendas. Everything fits together, once the picture the jigsaw pieces are intended to create is recognised. Politicians, officially the movers and shakers of the scene, are revealed to be nothing of the sort, merely puppets for public distraction and, if necessary, consumption. Take David Cameron as an example. Watch him pre-election and, regardless of personal political inclination, it's difficult not to detect a certain vigour, vitality, belief. Now, as if by magic, all this has gone. There's no passion, just a hollow man mouthing vacuous words. Has there, indeed, ever been a more ineffectual Prime Minister? The only thing I can recall him doing during his time in office is repeat the words 'cuts' and 'austerity' at frequent intervals. He's clearly been neutered; the same is the case with Obama. They've been got.
Meanwhile, as the nature of elected groups and officials becomes ever more pitiful, real control is increasingly being passed to undemocratic bodies working as far as possible out of the public eye. Unrepresentative and unaccountable groups are quietly and stealthily making the big decisions, partly funded by national governments (that is to say, by 'ordinary' people who pay taxes to the government). In this way, the even skeletal democratic process we now have is being cleverly bypassed. Which brings us nicely onto the United Nations and Agenda 21........
Gone are the days of my childhood, when our family would buy UNICEF Christmas cards in the hope that we were bringing a better life to the poorer children of the world through the beneficent channel of the United Nations. Sadly, this body now encompasses many of the dreams and wishes of the psychopathic few who would control the rest of us. For 'United Nations' read 'Single World Governance'. In a most excellent interview on Red Ice Radio, 16th August 2012 (link from 'favourites' on the right of this page), Rosa Koire talks on Agenda 21, the U.N.'s plan for the 21st century. She describes it as a 'global totalitarian state in progress.' Those who think these fancy ideas are all concocted by fringe wackos should note that Rosa is a real estate appraiser, no less; and anyone who dismisses climate change scepticism as the preserve of James Delingpole and the political right might take heed of the fact that she is also a Democrat in the USA. There's no ideological excuse for not doing your homework now, folks.....
Agenda 21 is, among other things, 'an action plan for sustainability', and one manifestation of the way that genuine love for Gaia has been hijacked. One of the primary aims of the programme is to create a perception of scarcity: perceived scarce resources = fear, insecurity = people will do whatever you ask if you promise to look after them. In this context, Rosa says something for which I shall be eternally grateful. It is something I had personally concluded, yet never stated, for fear of appearing irretrievably insane: the main reason windpower is pushed so forcefully is precisely because it is unreliable, and wastes resources in the form of enormous subsidies. It is a huge manipulation in order to create scarcity. Thank you, Rosa, for uttering this almost unspeakable truth, the only rational conclusion to draw after examining the evidence.
The time has arrived, it seems, to haul the middle classes fully aboard the galley of slaves; Agenda 21 and the creation of scarcity is one means by which this can be achieved. In Britain, at least (and I can only write with any authority about Britain), the working classes have been well-and-truly enslaved already. They were effectively disempowered politically by the Thatcher regime in the 1980s. Since then, befuddled by flat screen TVs, junk food, alcohol and heroin, dispossessed of any hope of progress through lack of meaningful job opportunities and a ghetto mentality, and tethered to state benefits for the duration, a populous underclass has been created. Effective control system slaves for life, the kind of people the control system really likes. Until now, the middle classes have been the willing foot soldiers of the control system, but now they must be reined in as well. Occasional enterprise, the odd independent thinker, all a bit dodgy. Spare time - always a dangerous luxury - must be snuffed out with long working hours, another product of the fabrication of scarcity.
Act Five: Time to Jump Ship?
This all sounds very dark and nasty. It is. But it should serve only as a wake-up call, a hefty kick in the direction of our own growth, liberation, unfoldment, call it what you will. We cannot be free without knowing how we are unfree; we cannot grow while ignorant of what we are to grow from. A certain education in control system dynamics, along with their effects on us and everything around us is a necessary step on the way. Our awareness of this has to be sharp, clear, and precise. Vague Buddhist mutterings about the unsatisfactoriness of samsaric existence, or the poisons of greed, hatred, and delusion, just don't do it - for me, at any rate -, and at worst can be used as abstracted excuses to avoid the real nitty-gritty of the human condition.
Frankly, anybody who still supports the invasion of the windfarms is either hopelessly and worryingly naive, too lazy and irresponsible to do their homework, totally blinkered by ideology, or set to make a hefty buck out of it for their own back pocket. This expensive and intermittent power source damages the planet while pretending to help it, and is part of a far wider programme of control, undertaken largely by unelected and unaccountable bodies. The intention is not the betterment and enlightenment of the whole of humanity, but the creation of 'Planet Slave'. To repeat: we can only become free if we know what we are to become free of. Time to discern, discriminate, disentangle. Time to jump ship.
